Search for: All records

Contrastive learning has served as a powerful framework in the early development of vision–language models (VLMs), demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in learning generalizable representations and establishing itself as the foundation for many state-of-the-art systems. However, despite these advances, its theoretical understanding remains limited, particularly under imbalanced data distributions that are prevalent in real-world settings. Such imbalance can degrade representation quality and induce biased model behavior, yet a rigorous characterization of these effects is still lacking. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework to analyze the training dynamics of contrastive learning with Transformer-based encoders under imbalanced data. Our results reveal that neuron weights evolve differently across three stages of training, with distinct dynamics for majority features, minority features, and the noise. We further show that minority features diminish neurons’ representational capacity, increase the need for more complex architectures, and impair the separation of ground-truth features from noise. These findings offer new theoretical insights into how data imbalance shapes learning in contrastive frameworks and serve as an early step towards principled modifications for developing more robust and unbiased representations. 

Contrastive learning has served as a powerful framework in the early development of vision–language models (VLMs), demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in learning generalizable representations and establishing itself as the foundation for many state-of-the-art systems. However, despite these advances, its theoretical understanding remains limited, particularly under imbalanced data distributions that are prevalent in real-world settings. Such imbalance can degrade representation quality and induce biased model behavior, yet a rigorous characterization of these effects is still lacking. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework to analyze the training dynamics of contrastive learning with Transformer-based encoders under imbalanced data. Our results reveal that neuron weights evolve differently across three stages of training, with distinct dynamics for majority features, minority features, and the noise. We further show that minority features diminish neurons’ representational capacity, increase the need for more complex architectures, and impair the separation of ground-truth features from noise. These findings offer new theoretical insights into how data imbalance shapes learning in contrastive frameworks and serve as an early step towards principled modifications for developing more robust and unbiased representations.